Economy News, Continent Economy: Goldman Sachs

Thursday, December 17, 2009

BLOOMBERG: Goldman Sachs Raising $5 Billion to Repay U.S., Shed Pay Limits

By Christine Harper

April 14 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc., buoyed by profit that exceeded the most optimistic Wall Street estimates and a 54 percent jump in its stock price, plans to raise $5 billion to repay federal rescue funds and shed government limits on executive pay.

Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein, eager to redeem the $10 billion his New York-based bank received in October, announced the fundraising plan yesterday as the company reported a $1.81 billion profit in the first quarter. The bank earned $3.39 a share, more than double the $1.64 average of 16 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg News.

�They�ll do better now in terms of what it costs to raise money than they can for the rest of the year,� said Christopher Whalen, a managing director at Torrance, California-based Institutional Risk Analytics. �I don�t think the rest of this year will be good.�

Goldman Sachs was the most profitable Wall Street firm before converting to a bank last year and posting its first quarterly loss since the company went public in 1999. The bank also said yesterday that it lost $780 million, or $2.15 a share, in the month of December, before the start of its new fiscal year.

The bank said it will use proceeds from the common stock offering plus �additional resources� to pay back the funds it got from the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Andrew Williams, a spokesman for the Treasury Department, declined to comment on Goldman Sachs�s announcement.

�Eye of Storm�

U.S. regulators are unlikely to object to the repayment. The government favors letting banks return money if they fare well on stress tests completed by the end of this month and can get private capital, according to people familiar with the matter.

�They can raise capital now; clearly the stock is strong,� said Peter Sorrentino, a senior portfolio manager at Huntington Asset Advisors, which has about $13.3 billion under management. �This is like the eye of the storm passing.�

The firm�s business model depends on its ability to attract top traders and bankers with promises of lucrative bonuses, a Wall Street pay model that is now under attack by politicians incensed at multimillion-dollar payouts to executives in an industry blamed for causing the economic crisis. The government imposed limits on executive compensation at banks such as Goldman Sachs that accepted more than $500 million in TARP funds.

Before last year, Goldman Sachs set two consecutive Wall Street pay records. Even last year, 953 of the bank�s employees made more than $1 million, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing unidentified people familiar with the matter. Lucas van Praag, a spokesman at Goldman Sachs, declined to comment.

Compensation Costs Rise

This year, the bank set aside $4.71 billion for compensation and benefits, 18 percent more than during the first quarter a year earlier. The expense totaled 50 percent of revenue, up from 48 percent in last year�s first quarter, even as the firm�s workforce shrank 12 percent to 27,989.

If Goldman Sachs returns the TARP money, it may pressure other banks to follow suit or risk appearing dependent on the government, said Brad Hintz, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. in New York who rates Goldman Sachs �market perform.�

The better-than-expected earnings will also make it difficult for competitors that are scheduled to report their own results this week or next week, said Sorrentino.

�This makes life much more difficult for everyone else out there,� he said. �To merely beat your numbers now will be viewed as, �What�s wrong?��

Goldman Sachs Results

Book value per share rose to $98.82 at the end of March compared with $98.68 in November, and return on equity, a gauge of how effectively the firm invests earnings, was 14.3 percent in the first quarter, Goldman Sachs said.

First-quarter revenue was $9.43 billion. The highlight was Goldman�s fixed-income, currencies and commodities business, known as FICC, in which trading revenue was a record $6.56 billion, 34 percent higher than its previous high, as client- driven income outweighed an $800 million loss on commercial mortgage loans, excluding hedges.

Goldman Sachs benefited as the gap between what banks pay to buy fixed-income securities and the price at which they sell, the so-called bid-ask spread, almost doubled to 19 basis points in six months, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

�FICC operated in a generally favorable environment characterized by client-driven activity, particularly in more liquid products, and high levels of volatility,� the bank said in a statement. �Illiquid assets generally continued to decline in value.�

Fewer Rivals

The loss of competitors including Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Bear Stearns Cos. meant Goldman Sachs attracted more trading business, said Huntington�s Sorrentino.

�A lot has to do with the fact that they really narrowed the playing field,� he said. �All that business has to be flowing through to someone.�

Because trading revenue is so hard to predict, �the market�s going to value asset management and investment banking and retail brokerage higher than it�s going to value trading,� said Bernstein�s Hintz. �As an analyst you have to ask yourself, �Is this sustainable?��

Every other business unit had lower revenue compared with the first quarter of 2008 or reported a loss.

Equity trading revenue was $2.0 billion as slower activity outside the U.S. meant the firm generated fewer trading commissions than a year ago.

Investment Banking

Investment banking revenue of $823 million compared with $1.17 billion in the first quarter of 2008, reflecting a decline in leveraged finance activity and fewer mergers and share offerings.

Asset management fees slumped 28 percent to $949 million as assets under management fell 3.3 percent. Securities services, which include the firm�s prime brokerage unit, made $503 million, 30 percent less than the first quarter of 2008.

Goldman Sachs had a $1.41 billion net loss from principal investments, including a $151 million loss from the firm�s investment in Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd.

Total assets on the balance sheet rose 5 percent from the end of November to $925 billion as of March 27. Of that, about $59 billion qualified as �Level 3� assets, which are the hardest to value, down from $66 billion at the end of November.

Goldman Sachs raised $5.75 billion by selling shares at $123 apiece in September in an offering that started after the company announced that Warren Buffett�s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. bought $5 billion in preferred stock.

A month later, Goldman Sachs was among nine financial institutions that shared $125 billion in the first payments from the Treasury�s $700 billion bailout program.

Related Links

Share Investor Blog - Stockmarket & Business commentary
Share Investor New Zealand Business News- Get more business news
Discuss this topic @ Shareinvestor.net.nz
Share Investor"s Daily Forex Updates

WSJ BLOG: Goldman"s Plan to Settle its Big IOU Should Pay Off

By JAMES B. STEWART

As a long-time Goldman Sachs shareholder, I applaud the firm"s decision to raise capital in order to repay the money it received from the government"s Troubled Asset Relief Program. The sooner, the better.

So far, Goldman has escaped the populist firestorm that engulfed American International Group, but don"t think that the passions that prompted the House to pass a punitive 90% tax on AIG bonuses have been permanently sated. With Goldman still doling out $4.7 billion in compensation, it will remain a tempting target, even if thousands of Goldman employees have lost their jobs.

Goldman"s top executives are already subject to TARP restrictions on executive pay. However satisfying it may be to see those highfliers humbled, it"s no way to run an investment bank.

That"s now being vividly demonstrated at AIG. The government, on behalf of us the taxpayers, seems well along the path toward destroying whatever was left of the AIG franchise. The Wall Street Journal reported this week that 20 employees of AIG"s financial products unit have quit (the unit is slated to be dismantled by the end of the year).

The brain drain threatens other bailout recipients as well, including Goldman. Byron Trott, the Goldman banker who oversaw the critical relationship with Warren Buffett, is leaving to start his own firm. Two weeks ago, Goldman confirmed to the Journal that two executives who led a division of the asset-management investment unit were quitting, as well as the co-head of quantitative research.

It"s a truism that an investment bank"s most critical assets are its people. The rest of the country may not like it, but the way to keep those people is to pay them. The ones really responsible for the financial disaster already have been fired, or left before the meltdown, with huge bonuses in their pockets. They"re the ones we should be angry about, not the ones still trying to save their firms.

No doubt, as a Goldman shareholder, I"m thinking like a part owner (however insignificant), and not like an angry taxpayer who, before TARP funds were doled out, had no interest in Goldman"s survival. But now that taxpayers own a part of so many financial companies, maybe it"s time we all start acting more like owners. I would love to watch a reality TV show in which an enraged taxpayer, eager to exact retribution, is installed as AIG"s chief executive and actually runs the place.

I have periodically recommended Goldman shares, most recently when I recommended following Warren Buffett"s strategy by buying calls with a strike price of $105 and high-yielding Goldman bonds. That strategy has paid off; at this week"s price of near $130, Goldman shares are at the highest level they"ve been since last October, and have gained 54% this year. They"ve more than doubled from their November lows. As a result of this run-up, I sold some Goldman calls with a strike price of $125, as I reported last week.

Obviously, Goldman, too, thought it was a good time to sell: It raised $5 billion this week in an offering priced at $123 a share. Nonetheless, I believe Goldman remains a good value for long-term investors, especially once it pays off the TARP money. I wasn"t offered a piece of this week"s Goldman offering, but I was able to add to my holdings shortly after at just $122.50 a share. Now the shares are trading $118.

James B. Stewart, a columnist for SmartMoney magazine and SmartMoney.com, writes weekly about his personal investing strategy. Unlike Dow Jones reporters, he may have positions in the stocks he writes about. For his past columns, see: www.smartmoney.com/commonsense.

Economy News, Continent Economy

Thursday, December 17, 2009

BLOOMBERG: Goldman Sachs Raising $5 Billion to Repay U.S., Shed Pay Limits

Sunday, November 22, 2009

WSJ BLOG: Goldman"s Plan to Settle its Big IOU Should Pay Off

Blog Archive

Labels

Links